Facts and fictions about sex trafficking and Vancouver’s 2010 Olympics



June 15, 2009,
Georgia Straight


By Joyce Arthur
With the 2010 Winter Olympic Games only seven months away, there is growing
speculation that trafficking in women will increase significantly in Vancouver.
A major new report lays these fears to rest by debunking the alleged link
between a boom in sex trafficking and large sporting events.

The 150-page report, Human Trafficking, Sex Work Safety and the 2010
, was commissioned by Vancouver’s Sex Industry Worker Safety Action
Group (SIWSAG). Warning that ill-informed assumptions about 2010 and trafficking
may actually endanger sex workers, its recommendations focus on the real
concern: that Games-related street closures and the planned security regime
risks displacing sex workers into more dangerous and isolated areas. The report
also notes community fears that street-level sex workers may be moved in an
effort to “clean up the streets”.
The report echoes the 2009 Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women report on
sex trafficking and the 2010 Olympics, which found
that “an increase of trafficking in persons into forced prostitution does not
occur around sporting events”. Further, the RCMP has stated that there is no
evidence to suggest an increase in human trafficking during the Games
(Vancouver Sun, January 7).
In the moral crusade against prostitution, trafficking is often wrongly
conflated with sex work, a position first argued by the Bush Republicans who
refused American funding aid to sex-worker and anti-trafficking organizations
that support the decriminalization of sex work. However, trafficking in
involves the coerced movement of a person into a situation of
forced labour
, while sex work is the consensual exchange of
sexual services for money

The great majority of sex workers are not trafficked
or controlled by “pimps”. Most are in business for themselves or work through an
agency, and most work indoors, not on the street where it’s far more dangerous.
Conflating trafficking with sex work is wrong and, worse, can mask the real
issues of violence and exploitation that occur within both trafficking and sex
work. For example, trafficking victims in other economic sectors, such as
construction or farm work, are ignored in the moral panic over sex trafficking.

Sex trafficking is a serious crime, but a wide range of factors makes it
difficult to prevent or detect. Global estimates of trafficking victims are
often no better than “guesstimates” and can be grossly over-inflated, especially
prior to large sporting events. An estimated 40,000 forced prostitutes were
expected in Germany for the 2006 World Cup, but they failed to show up. About
20,000 forced prostitutes were anticipated for the 2004 Summer Olympics in
Athens, but only 181 trafficked persons were actually reported in Greece for all
of 2004.
Sex workers have the same right to travel and migrate as anyone else, but
when they are wrongly labeled as trafficking victims, it leads to extreme human
rights violations. In many countries—including Canada—this means violent raids
of brothels, and the harassment, criminalization, detention, and deportation of
sex workers, most of whom are voluntary workers. A huge concern is that
misguided enforcement campaigns take place with no input from affected groups,
including sex-worker groups, trafficked persons, migrant workers, unions, and
relevant labour sectors.
The tendency to focus on international trafficking also means that domestic
trafficking is given short shrift. But forced migration from rural areas of
Canada to the cities is an enormous problem for aboriginal women and girls, who
live with a devastating legacy from colonialism and forced assimilation.
According to the Native Women’s Association of Canada, many “are driven into
domestic trafficking as a result by poverty and conditions on the reserve,
sometimes by conditions of abuse”.
The RCMP estimates that “600 women and children are trafficked into Canada
each year for the purpose of sexual exploitation” (SIWSAG report).
Anti-trafficking initiatives are critically important, but grossly inflating the
level of trafficking and treating all female sex workers as trafficked victims
does nothing to improve their safety—it only exacerbates their stigma and
We must involve affected stakeholders and apply an evidence-based approach to
prevent trafficking, rather than misrepresent the issues with scare-mongering,
sexist rhetoric. Most importantly, our focus must be on ensuring the safety and
full human rights of sex workers before, during, and after the 2010 Games.
Joyce Arthur is a cofounder of FIRST , a feminist group advocating for the rights of sex workers and
for the decriminalization of prostitution.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s