Feb. 15th, 2009 VICE ENFORCEMENT’S TOP OFFENDERS: Police are taking unprecedented steps to keep prostitution offenders off the Strip

February 20, 2009 at 6:46 pm (Uncategorized)

Call it a unique kind of most wanted list or simply an attempt to clamp down on the area’s worst-kept secret.

Working off a roster of the reputed 50 “most prolific prostitutes” in Clark County, Las Vegas police and prosecutors are taking unprecedented steps to keep repeat prostitution offenders off the Strip.

Some are criticizing the law enforcement crackdown as overly aggressive. And it comes at a time when some policymakers are talking about eventually legalizing or decriminalizing prostitution in the Las Vegas Valley.

The Vice Enforcement Top Offenders (VETO) list, which took the vice unit two years to compile, has the names of women with the longest prostitution-related criminal records in Clark County, said Lt. Karen Hughes.

Most of the women on the list have been convicted of exchanging sex for money or of prostitution-related theft charges inside several Strip hotels, not for street prostitution.

Within days of launching the crackdown, police over Super Bowl weekend arrested 13 of the women on charges of soliciting prostitution, loitering for the purposes of prostitution, or trespassing, police records show.

In all, 24 of the 50 women on the list were arrested between Jan. 28 and Feb. 13, all on misdemeanor charges.

Six on the list were arrested twice during that period.

Those arrested range in age from 20 to 41.

Police declined a request by the Review-Journal for the entire VETO list.

Hughes said it is time to stop the revolving door of prostitution-related arrests, especially when those arrests involve “trick rolls,” in which prostitutes steal from men.

“We’re talking about girls who have been arrested repeatedly over the years, ones that we all know by face and by name,” said Hughes, citing one woman who was arrested 18 times in a single year.

“If they get the message that Las Vegas is not going to ignore their subsequent arrests, then maybe they’ll take their lifestyle to a different city,” she said.

Or at least to a different part of Clark County.

In a memo to prosecutors about VETO cases, Assistant District Attorney Christopher Lalli last month told his staff to offer plea agreements that would include possible jail time and an order that defendants “refrain from entering the resort corridor” for a period of six or 12 months.

The guilty plea offer also will include 100 hours of community service and mandatory attendance of an AIDS awareness class.

If caught back in the resort corridor for any reason other than lawful employment or residency, the subject will be rearrested and given jail time, Lalli’s memo said.

City and county ordinances have allowed for so-called “order-out zones” in downtown Las Vegas and the Strip since the late 1990s.

In the past, order-outs usually were agreed to by defendants in exchange for probation.

Hughes spoke about the VETO program and the general problem of prostitution at a meeting of Justice Court judges last month.

The judges were briefed on the initiative even before the sheriff was.

Her appearance before the justices of the peace is problematic, said Gary Peck, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada. “It’s a cause for real concern when police are going to judges and promoting their policy for cleaning up the Strip.”

Peck also wondered whether police are relying so heavily on a Top 50 list that it will lead to prostitution arrests without probable cause. Such arrests would pave the way for the issuance of order-outs.

“It would be troubling if this list is being used as a substitute for sound police judgment,” he said.

Hughes said police won’t make initial prostitution-related arrests without proof that a new crime has been committed.

“Just because they’re on the list doesn’t mean they’re going to jail,” she said.

Lalli said he hopes the VETO effort will put a dent in prostitution. He cited special prosecution guidelines on other crimes such as car theft, which has been dwindling recently, as evidence that crackdowns work.

“Prostitution is one of those areas that brings with it a whole host of undesirable things,” Lalli said. “If you’re a prostitute out there, the message is, ‘Don’t commit your act of prostitution around here.’ “

Hughes said new names probably would be added to the VETO list once the first set of cases goes through the court system.

She said law enforcement’s tough approach to the problem could give way to a push for other alternative sentences for prostitutes and even a court that hears only prostitution cases.

Mayor Oscar Goodman, whose jurisdiction doesn’t include the Strip, questioned whether a crackdown on prostitutes is the best public policy. He said pimps should be the main targets of law enforcement.

“It’s the exploiters of these women who are the real villains here,” Goodman said. “I have a deep and abiding conviction that they are the primary offenders.”

Just because police don’t have a list of the most prolific pimps doesn’t mean the vice unit is ignoring that part of the problem in its undercover operations, Hughes said.

“We’ve got two investigative teams that deal with nothing but pimps,” she said. “But we also want to minimize opportunities for prostitutes to be aggressive with the tourists and with men who aren’t interested in that.”

Citing more than 5,000 prostitution arrests last year by the vice unit along the Strip, a 46 percent increase from the number two years ago, Hughes said she is concerned that prostitution hurts tourism and creates a bad image for Las Vegas.

“Vice has always had a zero tolerance on prostitution,” Hughes said. “There’s more work out there than we can wrap our arms around. Our hope is that we convey to prostitutes and pimps who operate here that this is not an easy city to make money.”

She rallied support for the VETO effort at a meeting of hotel security chiefs earlier this month.

Several hotel officials contacted by the Review-Journal didn’t return phone calls.

Hotels are just one place police are looking for prostitutes, Hughes said. Their attention is also directed on the street and at “erotic services” advertised in print and online publications.

In a related effort, undercover female officers make arrests of men who try to hire prostitutes. This group tends to be less apt to reoffend, according to Hughes.

As police ratchet up efforts to reduce prostitution, Goodman renewed his call for a discussion about options for legalizing or decriminalizing prostitution.

“If I were to engage in discussion, I’d be thinking in terms of a Little Amsterdam,” a red-light district with legalized brothels, he said. “But I’m not advocating it.”

Prostitution is legal in 10 rural Nevada counties, but not in Clark or Washoe counties.

Goodman said legalized and regulated brothels over time could generate hundreds of millions of dollars for this area.

State Sen. Bob Coffin, D-Las Vegas, chairman of the Senate Taxation Committee, said last month he was open to the idea of holding a legislative hearing to discuss legalizing and taxing prostitution in the state’s urban counties.

It appears, however, that the Legislature will not act on that idea this session.

At a recent meeting of the Review-Journal editorial board, Sheriff Doug Gillespie spoke out strongly against such proposals.

For now, Goodman said, Las Vegas police should enforce the laws on the book.

Barbara Brents, a sociology professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said she is surprised that law enforcement would focus so heavily on cracking down on prostitution.

“It seems pretty hypocritical to me to have an economy based on sexualizing women and then to come down on the women when police want to make it seem like they’re enforcing the law,” she said. “It’s coming down on women who are least able to fight back.”

Defense attorney James “Bucky” Buchanan, who has defended many clients accused of prostitution, sees practical problems with the effort.

“As much as Metro wants to do this, it’s just going to clog the courts,” he said. “I don’t think Metro has thought out the consequences and financial impact of this.”

On the bright side, Buchanan said, the crop of VETO arrests will make a lot of money for attorneys like him.

Contact reporter Alan Maimon at amaimon @reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0404.

Permalink Leave a Comment

FIRST: Unionized Sex industry workers made history at the World Social Forum in Belem, Brazil Jan. 27- Feb. 1 2009‏

February 12, 2009 at 5:31 pm (Uncategorized)

For Immediate Release
San Francisco, California
http://espu-ca.org/wp/

Unionized Sex industry workers made history at the World Social Forum in
Belem, Brazil Jan. 27- Feb. 1 2009. The special trade unionization of the
sex industry forum was sponsored in part by India¹s sex worker union,
Karnataka and the International Commission for Labor Rights. The public
forums featured presentations and discussions by trade union representatives
from South Africa, Nigeria and Germany that support organizing sex industry
workers as well as actual organized prostitutes from Bolivia, Brazil, USA
and the host country India.

The meeting culminated in sex industry worker, Carmen Lucia Paz making a
statement to the Final Assembly on Labour and Globalization that trade
unions and allies in social movements must recognize sex work as such,
calling for solidarity to end harassment, discrimination and forced labor
through the guarantees of the International Labor Organization¹s Fundamental
Principles and Rights at Work. Those trade unions should support sex workers
in challenging the laws that undermine sex worker organizing — through
criminal, civil or other means. Historic on all accounts.

Gautam Mody, Secretary of India¹s New Trade Union Initiative of which
Karnataka is officially affiliated, addressed sex worker participants. Mody
stated that unionization comes when workers face their bosses. For sex
industry workers, those bosses present themselves in many tiers; direct and
indirect. South Africa¹s Sex Worker Education and Advocacy Taskforce
presented newly released research of Cape Town¹s sex industry. Prostitutes
rights organizers hailed this new study documented in the book, ³Selling Sex
in Cape Town² by Chandre Gould as new standard for researchers when
targeting the sex industry. The study discredits claims by anti prostitution
and migration groups that Cape Town is an originator, a recruiting site and
a destination place for forced labor in the sex industry. The study also
disproves statements that disproportionately high numbers of under aged
workers dominate the sex industry instead sighted very few actual incidences
of underage workers have occurred in Cape Town.

Other distinguished sex work centered acts by NOG¹s such as Brazil¹s Davida
presented on how they were able to create their own funding for HIV services
after tuning down 40 million dollars in 2005 from the United States Agency
for International Development in which required NGO¹s who received the
funding to not discusses rights when delivering condoms to prostitutes.
Brazil considers prostitutes partners in its successful fight against new
HIV infections. Davida produces a clothing line and a fashion show by and
for prostitutes. Prostitution is not illegal in Brazil.

The president of Organización Nacional de Activistas por la Emancipación de
la Mujer of Bolivia told first hand accounts of how a mob shut down work
locations for many prostitutes which resulted in the sex workers going on a
hunger strike and sewing their mouths shut. Violence by police drove many
workers into seeking protection from the church, only to be turned away by
the nuns. Prostitution is not illegal in Bolivia.

But hope was found in the innovative perspective from South Africa¹s
Commercial, Catering and Allied Workers Union which stated that sex workers
would be included in this union as are other informal sector worker
including children. Nigeria¹s Labor Congress already recognizes sex work as
work. Germany¹s public section union, Ver.di presented on a study of sex
workers from 2002 and has now made provision to include prostitutes who want
to be come members. Prostitutes don¹t have to say they are prostitutes in
order to join nor do they have to submit to mandatory testing.

Other unionized prostitute groups like Argentina and the Netherlands, as
well as other organized groups in Southeast Asia, Australia and Spain where
not represented including two other important leaders of Karnataka, the host
sex worker union. The two leaders were unable to attend because they
didn¹t qualify for visas. One had a charge pending stemming from working in
a brothel and other for protesting the forced rescue of brothel workers by
police who beat and held the rescuees captive in shelters. Prostitution is
not illegal in India. Also not in attendance was England¹s International
Sex Worker Union as members are currently embroiled in opposing legislation
that¹s would further violate sex industry workers¹ human, labor and civil
rights.

Maxine Doogan
Erotic Service Providers Union

Permalink Leave a Comment

18th Annual Women’s Memorial March – Feb. 14th 2009

February 11, 2009 at 4:48 pm (Uncategorized)

18TH ANNUAL WOMEN’S MEMORIAL MARCH
PRESS CONFERENCE: SAT FEB 14th

10:30 AM

ON CARNEGIE CENTRE PATIO
February 9, 2009. VANCOUVER

- The February 14th Women’s Memorial March is
held on Valentine’s Day each year to honour the memories of the women from
the Downtown Eastside who die each year due to the violence of physical,
mental, emotional and spiritual abuse. The Women’s Memorial march began 18
years ago after the brutal murder of a Coast Salish woman that left the
neighbourhood in shock. This was the catalyst that moved women to take
action against ongoing violence of women in the Downtown Eastside.
The heinous and unimaginable violence that took the lives of Sereena
Abotsway, Marnie Frey, Andrea Joesbury, Georgina Papin, Mona Wilson and
Brenda Wolfe has left a void in the community.

According to Marlene George, Feb 14th Memorial March Committee Organizer,
the community is also awaiting justice for the murders of the additional
twenty women: “We demand a full measure of justice for the twenty women
whose murders have unfortunately become a closed chapter for this
government. These women may not be with us today, but we cannot let their
lives and struggles be forgotten.”

These women are: Andrea Borhaven, Heather Bottomley, Heather Chinnock,
Wendy Crawford, Sarah DeVries, Tiffany Drew, Cara Ellis, Cynthia Felics,
Jennifer Furminger, Inga Hall, Helen Hallmark, Tanya Holyk, Sherry Irving,
Angela Jardine, Patricia Johnson, Debra Jones, Kerry Koski, Jacqueline
McDonell, Diana Melnick and Dianne Rock.

According to the Missing Women’s Task Force, there are still 39 women
officially listed as missing from the DTES. “Every year the list continues
to grow. We have to understand that violence against women is always
unacceptable. These women are our mothers, daughters, sisters, aunties,
grandmothers, and friends. Every life is precious and we must continue to
work for justice for murdered and missing women,” states George.

This year, marches will also be held on the same day in Toronto, Winnipeg,
Calgary, Edmonton, Sudbury, London, and Victoria. In Vancouver

, a
community of friends and family members led by women will move together
through the streets of the Downtown Eastside, stopping at the sites where
women have died, lay a red or yellow rose in remembrance, and perform
spiritual ceremonies for healing.
ITINERARY FOR MEDIA FOR 18TH ANNUAL WOMEN’S MEMORIAL MARCH

10:30 AM: PRESS SESSION on Carnegie Centre Patio. Q&A with community members.
11:15 AM
: Media accreditation for Carnegie Centre Theatre program (please
note media is not guaranteed space, arrive early and line up along the
back as the Theatre fills up by
11:45
). There will be no Q&A.
12:00 PM: Carnegie Centre Theatre Program: Family members speak in
remembrance of their daughters
1:00 PM: March begins with a circle at Main & Hastings (Media are asked
not to film any of the spiritual ceremonies that are part of the march)
2:00 PM: Community activists speak outside the Vancouver Police Station
2:30 PM: Healing Circle at Oppenheimer Park, Candles of Remembrance

PEACE

 

 

 

 

Permalink Leave a Comment

PIVOT News Wire

February 9, 2009 at 5:56 pm (Uncategorized)

 

 

Sign the petition for women’s access to justice

Pivot Legal Society and West Coast Leaf are asking individuals and organizations concerned with the ongoing assault on B.C.’s legal aid system and the impacts of recent service cuts on women to add their names to this open letter and petition to the Attorney General of British Columbia.

“The ability of women to access the justice system was seriously undermined by the dismantling of B.C.’s legal aid system in 2002” says Darcie Bennett, coordinator of the Jane Doe Legal Network, a Pivot project for women who have experienced violence. “This latest round of cuts will only intensify an already dire situation.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN THE PETITION

 

 

The Petition Letter

The recent continuation of cuts to legal aid in B.C. will have a devastating impact on women, particularly those living in poverty, women of colour, Aboriginal women, and other marginalized women. These cuts are taking place at a time when Canada is already being criticized for its failure to meet its international obligation to ensure that women have equal access to the justice system.

A recent study released by the Legal Services Society of B.C. (“LSS”) found that more than 80% of low-income British Columbians are dealing with legal issues that are serious and difficult to resolve, yet both the quality and quantity of legal services available to low income people continue to erode. The most recent erosion of legal services in B.C. includes:

·                         cuts to the tariffs for family, immigration and criminal law;

·                         stricter screening processes and eligibility requirements for clients;

·                         the closing of the family law clinic;

·                         reductions in staff lawyers; and

·                         reductions in services for people who cannot access legal representation through LSS, including cuts to the staffing of the LawLINE and family and other duty counsel.

Reducing the legal aid tariffs to private bar lawyers is unacceptable. Even at current tariff rates, lawyers cannot effectively serve their clients. The low number of hours funded under the legal aid tariff in family matters, child protection cases, and immigration/refugee cases seriously undermines the capacity of lawyers to provide the quality of legal services low income British Columbians so desperately need.  

One impact of the 2002 cuts was to make it challenging for women to find lawyers willing to take legal aid cases in the few instances that women were found eligible for legal aid coverage. These most recent cuts will make that much, much worse. 
 
This latest round of cuts will mean that community groups and women’s organizations will be expected to fill an even larger service gap without additional resources or training. Women who are unable to access advocacy services will continue to be forced to navigate the system on their own, with potentially devastating consequences for themselves and their families.

Services provided by staff lawyers, such as those provided through the family law clinic, need to be expanded not eliminated. LSS staff lawyers are able to take cases that private lawyers simply cannot take on with the kind of file management and care many of the clients accessing the clinic require. Most often these are cases that involve critical family issues, that may have been lingering in the system for a long time, and involve complicating factors, such as, insecure immigration status, litigation harassment by an ex partner, a history of domestic violence and/or mental illness.  


Cuts to the LawLINE and family law duty counsel, as well as the decision not to proceed with the Justice Access Centre in
Vancouver, will make it next to impossible to access timely legal information and advice for those who can not afford legal representation, do not qualify for legal representation, or are not aware of community legal services.  Significant reductions in extended service referrals for family law, combined with stricter standards for approving immigration referrals will only increase the number of self-represented litigants attempting to navigate the system without support.


The Legal Services Society’s position that these cuts are necessary in light of the current fiscal environment ignores the reality that these short-term savings will lead to greater costs down the road. Direct costs to the provincial government will include an increasingly backlogged court system, an increase in health costs
(see a recent LSS study on the connection between health and legal problems), and a cost to income assistance programs and other social services. Without legal representation, some women may abandon their fight for the spousal and child support that they are entitled to in law.

There will also be indirect costs to individuals, families and society, including,  greater social services costs as women’s health and ability to work and care for their children is impacted by legal problems that are left unresolved or unfairly resolved. 

It is imperative that this latest round of cuts to legal services in British Columbia be reversed. However, this latest crisis is indicative of a broader failure on the part of both the provincial and the federal governments to ensure equal and adequate access to the justice system. This crisis reflects the continued inability of LSS to fulfill its stated mission “to provide innovative and collaborative legal aid services that enable people with low incomes to effectively address their issues within the justice system”.

 

In November 2008, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women stated in its Concluding Observations on Canada, “The Committee is concerned at reports that financial support for civil legal aid has diminished and that access to it has become increasingly restricted, in particular in British Columbia, consequently denying low-income women access to legal representation and legal services.” This latest round of cuts to legal services in BC demonstrates a lack of commitment on the part of both the LSS and the federal and provincial governments to address the concerns raised by CEDAW.
  
An Ipsos Reid survey commissioned by LSS found that 97% of British Columbians agree that everyone should have access to the justice system and that 78% agree that government should give the same priority to funding legal aid as to other social services such as health care and education. 

Now is the time to restore services and to begin to develop a comprehensive strategy to build a legal aid system that ensures that women have equal access to the justice system and reflects the needs and values of all British Columbians.   

 

To add your name to the list of individuals and organizations that support this statement, follow the link below:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/access-to-justice

 

Pivot’s mandate is to take a strategic approach to social change, using the law to address the root causes that undermine the quality of life of those most on the margins. We believe that everyone, regardless of income, benefits from a healthy and inclusive community where values such as opportunity, respect and equality are strongly rooted in the law.

Permalink Leave a Comment